Outer space is entering a renewed phase of strategic importance, shaped by rapid technological innovation, growing competition and deepening global dependence on space-enabled infrastructure and services. As the domain becomes increasingly critical to global infrastructure and attracts diverse commercial actors, the ways in which space is accessed, used and governed are also changing.

Against this backdrop, the conference provided a platform for policymakers, industry, academia and civil society to exchange perspectives and explore practical pathways towards strengthening the security and sustainability of outer space.

A changing space security environment

Opening the conference, UNIDIR Director Robin Geiss highlighted four developments reshaping the space security environment:

• Space is now treated as a strategic domain.

• Counterspace activity is increasing.

• Advances in technology are changing how space systems operate.

• Mega constellations and the interconnection of commercial and government systems are redefining what security in orbit means.

In her keynote address, Under-Secretary-General and High Representative for Disarmament Affairs Izumi Nakamitsu welcomed the range of actors participating in the discussion and highlighted the importance of identifying areas of convergence as the space security environment continues to evolve.

© 2026 UNIDIR/Antoine Tardy

Strategic dialogue in expert panels and beyond

Over the two days, participants examined the technical, legal and policy dimensions of developments in space activity through focused discussions on some of the most pressing questions facing the international space security community. The conference programme featured a series of expert panels:

• Mapping space threats and consequences highlighted how ambiguity in the space security environment, compounded by the widespread use of dual-use technologies and the absence of common frameworks, can lead to different interpretations of the same activities. The panellists emphasized the importance of strengthening governance and compliance mechanisms and improving legal clarity to reduce the risks of miscalculation and escalation.

• Strategic stability and the security of space architecture examined the growing integration of space systems into nuclear command, control and communications, noting how the same space capabilities can both strengthen stability through enhanced situational awareness and undermine it by creating vulnerabilities or increasing uncertainty during crises.

• Taking stock of efforts to advance the prevention of an arms race in outer space brought together distinguished diplomatic representatives to discuss how shared commitments can be translated into concrete approaches for preventing an arms race in outer space. The discussion also examined the respective contributions of legally binding instruments and non-binding norms to strengthening stability and security in outer space.

• Complex interactions in a multi-actor orbit considered how commercial participation and the proliferation of new actors and activities are reshaping the space security environment. The discussion focused on the application of international law to these evolving dynamics, including the responsibility of States for national activities in outer space and emerging questions around thresholds of targetability.

• Monitoring, verification and visibility in outer space explored what space situational awareness can do as a means of verifying legally binding agreements and monitoring norms of behaviour. The panel highlighted that although orbital manoeuvres are becoming transparent, the trajectories of objects alone rarely reveal intent, meaning there is a growing need for shared standards.

• Securing space data and information and communication technology infrastructure looked at the threats and risks facing terrestrial and orbital systems. The panel also considered what the manipulation, disruption or denial of space-derived data means for strategic stability, with particular consequences for States that rely on infrastructure hosted elsewhere. As greater autonomy in orbit becomes harder to avoid, speakers emphasized verifiability and the need to retain human involvement in decision-making.

The conference also featured a collaborative session with the United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs (UNOOSA). This discussion featured Rosanna Diem-Hoffmann, Lead for Space Law, Policy and Sustainability at UNOOSA, and Fatima Salem Al Shamsi, Chair of the United Nations Expert Group on Space Situational Awareness. The two speakers briefed participants on recent progress made regarding intersecting topics from the Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space. This included work by the Group on Space Resource Activity and deliberations on information-sharing that led to the newly established United Nations Satellite Operator Contact Hub.

Bringing youth centre stage

For the third year in a row, the conference ran a global campaign that sought to bring in and amplify young people’s perspectives on space. The 2026 edition asked young people to submit videos exploring how innovations in space architecture and shared technical standards can address emerging security and sustainability challenges. The winners, Ali Shan and Joel Pajiah, were also able to present their innovative work through a pair of lightning talks on the second day of the conference.

© 2026 UNIDIR/Antoine Tardy

Building the next generation of space security expertise

The 2026 conference also marked an important milestone for UNIDIR’s Space Security Programme, with the inaugural cohort of Space Security Research Fellows joining the conference for the first time. These nine fellows from across all five United Nations regional groups were selected for the year-long programme through a highly competitive process. Their participation in the conference, where they engaged with diplomats and experts from around the world, came as part of a week-long series of workshop activities held in person in Geneva.

Looking ahead, UNIDIR will continue to support dialogue on space security, foster common understanding among diverse stakeholders and advance practical approaches to strengthening security and stability in outer space.

The post Navigating a new era of strategic importance in outer space first appeared on UNIDIR.

UNIDIR’s Space Security Research Fellowship is a year‑long programme designed to equip early-career space security professionals with the knowledge, skills and networks needed to navigate today’s rapidly evolving outer space environment. Fellows come from a diverse range of countries and academic backgrounds. 

The recent gathering in Geneva provided an important opportunity for Fellows to engage directly with UNIDIR’s space security team, as well as with practitioners from States, international organizations, academia and the private sector. Coming together in person created space for the kinds of conversations, exchanges and sharing of insights and experiences that can be difficult to achieve by virtual means. 

Experiencing the international community  

On the first day, the Fellows were welcomed at the Palais des Nations, where they held an interactive session with UNIDIR’s Director, Dr Robin Geiss, and the Head of UNIDIR’s Space Security and Weapons of Mass Destruction Programmes, Dr James Revill. They then heard from Michael Spies, Deputy Chief of the UN Office for Disarmament Affairs Geneva Branch. During these sessions, the Fellows learned firsthand from those who support multilateral space processes. 

Next, they took part in a guided tour of the Palais des Nations, followed by a luncheon with experienced diplomats actively engaged in disarmament negotiations. During this unique opportunity for exchange, the diplomats generously shared their perspectives on the current challenges facing disarmament diplomacy, including those related to multilateral processes on space security. 

The first day continued with a visit to the Permanent Delegation of the European Union to UN Geneva, where they heard from Klemen Polak, the Head of the Disarmament Section, on the challenges of addressing disarmament issues relating to conventional arms, emerging technologies, outer space security, and nuclear, chemical and biological weapons. 

© 2026, UNIDIR

The following two days were dedicated to the Outer Space Security Conference 2026 (OS26), which featured a diverse cohort of experienced professionals from 94 countries, participating both in person and online. The Fellows engaged actively throughout the event, asking insightful questions and connecting with participants during the breaks. Through their active participation and exchanges, they contributed to the success of OS26. 

© 2026, UNIDIR/Antoine Tardy

Discovering industry and academic perspectives  

The Fellows then headed to the nearby city of Lausanne for a highly interactive exchange at the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), where they were welcomed by Emmanuelle David, Executive Director of the EPFL Space Center. There, they learned about how academia is contributing to space situational awareness and space sustainability. 

© 2026, UNIDIR

This was followed by a visit to the private company ClearSpace, which is developing active debris removal systems for on-orbit operations, putting space sustainability into practice. The Fellows gained a deeper understanding of the engineering, policy and business challenges behind operations in space. The engagement also underlined the importance of greater transparency and access to satellite data, including model information and optical markers that can make missions and sustainability efforts both easier and safer. 

© 2026, UNIDIR

Engaging with global institutions in the space governance landscape 

The last day began with a visit to the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). The visit included a tour of the ICRC Museum, which showcases the history and worldwide humanitarian action of the Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement. This was followed by an interactive discussion with Mauro Vignati, an ICRC Advisor on Digital Technologies of Warfare, who explored the intersection between space security and International humanitarian law, as well as outlining the ICRC’s contributions to the Open-ended working group on the prevention of an arms race in outer space in all its aspects. 

© 2026, UNIDIR

The Fellows’ final appointment of the week took them to the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), where Senior Radiocommunication Engineer, Véronique Glaude, walked them through the ITU’s history and its current role within the UN system. Fellows also learned how the ITU functions and manages increasingly congested resources, whether in terms of orbital slots or the electromagnetic spectrum.  

UNIDIR, and the Space Security Fellows in particular, would like to thank all of the organizations and individuals who shared their valuable time and expertise throughout the course of the week. The Fellows gained new knowledge, insights and practical experience, ending the week with renewed motivation to further develop their independent research and their careers. The UNIDIR Space Security Programme aims to continue receiving support that will allow this initiative to continue in the coming years, furthering UNIDIR’s goal of cultivating and amplifying diverse expertise from new generations to ensure the sustainable and peaceful use of outer space. 

© 2026, UNIDIR

The post UNIDIR Space Security Fellows experience multilateral Geneva first appeared on UNIDIR.

Building on previous efforts to strengthen youth engagement in multilateral space security discussions, the competition gave young people a platform to share their innovations and research for a more secure outer space environment.

This year’s competition received over 200 submissions, breaking last year’s record, with representation from all United Nations regional groups. This growing global interest highlights the importance of including younger generations in space security conversations and amplifying their work.

Through this initiative, UNIDIR and CIGI have engaged with almost 450 participants to date, which is a testament to an increasing awareness of space security issues among young people around the world.

Fresh perspectives on space security

The video competition invited young people aged 18-25 to showcase their technical research and explain what innovations to space systems could contribute to a more secure and sustainable space for all humankind.

The competition attracted submissions covering shared technical standards, cyber-resilient architecture, enhanced operational transparency and open-source monitoring frameworks. These proposals offered solutions to a wide range of challenges and priorities for the technically informed, multilateral governance of space security, with particular attention paid to security and sustainability dilemmas and the evolving threat landscape in outer space.

Spotlighting this year’s winners

A panel of independent experts from UNIDIR and CIGI, serving in their personal capacities, reviewed all of this year’s submissions. To ensure a fair and equitable selection process, the panel applied a set of established evaluation criteria. The top two videos selected demonstrate original, compelling and timely innovations for the future of space security. UNIDIR awarded the creators of these videos a fully funded trip to Geneva to attend UNIDIR’s Outer Space Security Conference 2026, where they were able to present their videos to an international audience of experts and decision makers.

This year’s Youth Video Competition winners are:

Ali Shan, Youth Advocate and STEM Student, Pakistan

Ali Shan has a passion for youth advocacy and engaging underprivileged young people in STEM. He organizes Beaconhouse Notion of Academia, one of the largest high school STEM Olympiads in Pakistan, which brings together over 1,000 students to experiment with miniature satellite systems, heat shield prototyping and rocketry. He earned an Outstanding Performance Award at the STEMx bootcamp and represented Pakistan at the 2022 World Scholar’s Cup. Beyond STEM, Ali is interested in policymaking and delivered a speech on youth and peacebuilding at the Pakistan Institute for Parliamentary Services.

Drawing on his experience of engaging with young people on space innovation, Ali’s video proposes solutions for analysing orbital patterns and flagging anomalous satellite manoeuvres through a specialized large language model system. It also suggests that a set of international standards on satellite design, debris removal and deorbit timelines be established to minimize space debris.

Joel Modokpe Pajiah, Law Trainee, Nigerian Law School

Joel Modokpe Pajiah is a law graduate and professional trainee at the Nigerian Law School, specializing in public international law, international humanitarian law and space law. He has participated in major international moot competitions, including Oxford University’s 2024 Monroe E. Price Media Moot Court Competition and the 2025 Nigerian Championship of the Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Competition, where he was named Best Counsel. Previously, Joel interned at the Department of International Law and Comparative Law in the Federal Ministry of Justice in Abuja, Nigeria.

Addressing the challenge of orbital collisions, Joel’s video suggests building a shared tracking and monitoring system, which would allow actors to broadcast verifiable satellite routes and resolve a technical ambiguity that increases the risk of conflict in space.

Collaborating with the next generation on space security

The Outer Space Security Conference Youth Video Competition demonstrates that young leaders have important, innovative ideas to contribute and underlines the need to deepen their inclusion in multilateral processes. Their perceptive comments and questions enriched the discussions among experts and policymakers throughout the two days of the conference. They also provided crucial insights into both the immediate and the more long-standing areas of interest for the next generation of decision makers. UNIDIR remains committed to strengthening young people’s research capacity and to amplifying their voices in space security governance. They have a vital role to play in ensuring that the space domain remains peaceful and sustainable for all.

The post Amplifying youth-led innovations for space security first appeared on UNIDIR.

The dialogues explored how science and technology tools can support the convention and the design of a lasting advisory mechanism to keep pace with scientific change. Both events were organized under UNIDIR’s Science and Technology Watchtower project and as part of the joint Technical Briefs series on emerging technologies and the convention.

Scientific advice mechanism for the convention

The first event on designing a science and technology advisory mechanism for the Biological Weapons Convention brought together experts from international scientific advisory bodies, multilateral policy research and disarmament diplomacy. Drawing on the experiences of the Secretary-General’s Scientific Advisory Board, the International Science Council, the Scientific Advisory Board of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) and other bodies, participants explored what a comparable mechanism for the Biological Weapons Convention could look like, including how it might be composed, identify priorities and build consensus.

OPCW’s Scientific Advisory Board offered one of the relevant composition components: its 25 members serve in a personal capacity rather than as government representatives, with rotating terms and informal geographic and gender balance that help the body maintain both independence and legitimacy. On process, speakers shared experience on dealing with disagreements among members, noting that transparently recording dissenting views in a final report can be a legitimate and often more useful outcome.

The experience of the UN Secretary-General’s Scientific Advisory Board offered another important lesson:

Scientific advice has impact only once translated for a diplomatic audience.

Short, accessible briefs and informal briefings can help connect scientists directly with diplomats and bring scientific findings into policy discussions.

Participants also discussed the design of the convention’s own proposed mechanism, which envisages a hybrid model combining an open-ended body for broad participation with a smaller, focused reporting committee, to balance inclusivity with substantive technical work.

Speakers agreed that any mechanism should remain strictly advisory and feed transparently into the convention’s existing review cycle, helping States Parties turn scientific uncertainty into clarity they can act on.

Practical tools for implementation

The second event on applied science and technology tools for prevention, risk assessment and biorisk governance brought together speakers from public health, verification, biosecurity research and biotechnology policy to present concrete tools already in use or under development.

Emerging technologies are creating practical instruments to support the convention’s purpose, offering ways forward even in the continued absence of a formal verification regime.

Identifying governance gaps

The tools presented addressed different governance needs, from diagnosing gaps and assessing risk to building transparency. The Biorisk Implementation and Evaluation Tool, developed by the World Health Organization based on the 2022 Global Guidance Framework for the Responsible Use of Life Sciences, helps States self-diagnose their governance gaps. Available in national and institutional versions, the platform guides users through a step-by-step process to generate a risk score and identify priority actions.

Taking a different approach, VERTIC and King’s College London applied the logic of the IAEA’s Acquisition Path Analysis, used in nuclear safeguards, to hypothetical biological-weapons scenarios. By mapping pathways from agent acquisition to weaponization and identifying associated “observables,” they assessed how different monitoring and verification measures could capture them. By testing these approaches against the convention’s existing confidence-building measures, they revealed key practical gaps that were not captured in all cases, underscoring the level of detail needed to weigh the relative confidence, intrusiveness and cost of proposed measures.

Assessing emerging risks

RAND’s Risk Index Observatory applies a graded risk scale to AI-enabled biological tools such as protein-design algorithms, aiming to flag high-risk capabilities early while avoiding blanket restrictions on responsible research.

Meanwhile, early-stage research under the VERIBIO project at the University of Hamburg and Technical University of Hamburg, is exploring how industrial bioprocesses could be monitored for verification purposes while protecting confidential details of the process. Researchers are using an AI-based anomaly-detection model to identify when a bacterial strain’s “fingerprint” deviates from what is expected, potentially signaling it has been substituted for one producing a harmful agent.

Strengthening transparency

The Global DNA Synthesis Map and Common Mechanism developed by IBBIS give synthesis providers an open-source basis for screening orders against risky sequences across more than fifty regulatory frameworks.

Speakers discussed that these tools could support confidence-building, awareness-raising and national implementation of the convention under its Article IV, while also informing future efforts to the development of a verification mechanism.

As science and technology continue to advance, keeping the Biological Weapons Convention effective will require sustained engagement with the opportunities and challenges they present. Held under UNIDIR’s Science and Technology Watchtower, the dialogues demonstrated the value of drawing on existing scientific advisory practice while exploring practical tools that can support prevention, risk assessment, transparency and future verification.

The post UNIDIR advances dialogue on science and technology for the Biological Weapons Convention first appeared on UNIDIR.

More than 20 participants from Sirigu and Manyoro, communities situated along the Ghana–Burkina Faso border, took part in the workshop. Participants included traditional leaders, volunteers who serve as WANEP community-based conflict early warning monitors, the Regional Peace Council, and local security actors – including the police and immigration.

Communities at the frontline of prevention

Communities living in border areas are often among the first to observe changes in local security dynamics. Their knowledge of local contexts and networks also provides important insights into emerging risks, including the movement and diversion of arms and ammunition.

Building on this local knowledge, the workshop strengthened this existing community-based early warning capacity by equipping participants with a better understanding of how ammunition diversion and trafficking can contribute to insecurity and how related warning signs can be identified, documented and reported.

The project we are commencing here today contributes particularly to the Global Framework for Through-Life Conventional Ammunition Management objectives relating to diversion prevention, accountability, monitoring and information sharing. Lessons gathered here are intended to become a model for community prevention across West Africa.

H.E. Hiroshi Yoshimoto, Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary to the Republic of Ghana

Building practical skills to identify ammunition diversion

Through interactive discussions and practical exercises, community monitors explored how to:

• understand arms and ammunition diversion dynamics in border communities;

• identify indicators of arms and ammunition diversion and trafficking; and

• strengthen practical skills for the safe and systematic collection, documentation and reporting of diversion-relevant information.

The movement of unauthorized arms and ammunition destabilizes local communities, fuels chieftaincy and land disputes… When our local citizens are empowered to detect early warning signs of ammunition diversion, they become active partners alongside our security forces rather than passive bystanders.

Hon. Faustina Abalu, Municipal Chief Executive of the Kassena Nankana Municipal Assembly

Connecting community actors and local authorities

Effective conflict early warning also depends on trusted channels for information-sharing and cooperation between communities and relevant authorities.

On the third day of the workshop, community monitors engaged in an open dialogue with representatives from the National Peace Council, Immigration Office and civil society. The discussion provided an opportunity to explore ways of strengthening trust, communication and collaboration between community actors and local security institutions.

A key outcome from the workshop was the development of community monitoring and information-sharing plans, providing a practical basis for participants to apply their learning within their respective communities.

Effective arms control begins with understanding the realities and risks communities face. By connecting community knowledge with formal early warning and security structures, we can strengthen prevention and reduce the risks associated with the diversion and misuse of arms and ammunition.

Fiifi Edu-Afful, Senior Researcher, Conventional Weapons Programme, UNIDIR

From insights to action

The three-day workshop forms part of the broader community-led arms control initiative of UNIDIR’s Conventional Weapons Programme, which seeks to integrate arms control measures into conflict prevention, peacebuilding and armed violence reduction. Insights shared by the participants will inform the development of a “menu of options” to support communities in managing weapons and ammunition, thereby preventing proliferation and misuse.

The post Strengthening community capacity to prevent ammunition diversion first appeared on UNIDIR.

Introduced on the sidelines of the APMBC Intersessional Meetings in Geneva, the initiative “Working towards a mine-free Africa: Building African capacity to remove threats posed by anti-personnel landmines to peace, security and development” comes at a critical time.

Since 1997, the APMBC has achieved significant progress – facilitating widespread mine clearance and reducing human costs of weapons. Yet, challenges persist. Thirty-three States Parties have outstanding Article 5 (mine clearance) obligations. Sixteen of these are from Africa, and many face constraints in securing domestic resources and international cooperation including assistance.

These challenges have been compounded by broader pressures on arms control and humanitarian disarmament instruments, which in turn underscores the importance of the effective implementation by all States Parties of the APMBC and its universalization.

Strengthening capacity and accelerating progress towards completion

As part of this initiative, a dedicated project aims to support five of the African States that are receiving low levels of international cooperation and assistance to fulfill their APMBC Article 5 obligations. It has two, interconnected objectives:

• First, to build national capacity in up to five African States to fulfil their APMBC Article 5 obligations related to mine clearance and land release; and
• Second, to promote and support the exchange of knowledge and experience on building African national capacity to implement APMBC obligations.

It will focus on African States Parties that have existing extensions granted by the Meeting of States Parties, established national action plans, and comparatively small or medium levels of contamination. These include Guinea-Bissau, Mauritania, Senegal, South Sudan, and Zimbabwe. The diversity and uniqueness of each context can help generate knowledge and understanding of how targeted support can be adapted to different country settings.

In addition to strengthening national capacities, the initiative will help ensure that the knowledge and experiences generated are socialized among key stakeholders. This includes other APMBC States Parties, African Union (AU) and UN Member States, other regional organizations such as the AU, regional economic communities, expert non-governmental organizations, and the public at large.

Ultimately, this will also benefit communities and individuals – including women, men, girls and boys – who continue to suffer from the negative, age-differentiated and gendered impacts of anti-personnel landmines on the African continent, and elsewhere.

The project is implemented by UNIDIR’s Conventional Weapons Programme, in cooperation with the Mines Advisory Group (MAG), and in close coordination with the APMBC Implementation Support Unit (ISU), other stakeholders and partners.

Speaking at the launch event, and joined by all partners and the APMBC Zambia presidency, the EU highlighted its commitment to humanitarian disarmament and its concrete support for the initiative:

The EU Council has committed 3 million EUR under the Common Foreign and Security Policy budget to support five African States close to completion in fulfilling their Article 5 obligations through a 36-month project, implemented by UNIDIR in partnership with MAG.

Ambassador Michele Cervone d’Urso, Deputy Head, EU Delegation to the UN and other international organizations in Geneva

The EU further emphasized the initiative’s alignment with its broader strategic priorities on peace, security and sustainable development, as outlined in its Global Strategy and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.

An inclusive, cooperative and partnership-driven approach

Central to the initiative is a strong emphasis on national ownership, cooperation and coordination across stakeholders to translate political commitments into practical, on the ground impact.

As President of the convention and as an African State, Zambia is honoured to have been part of the launch of this project that will accelerate progress toward a mine-free future.

Mulima Lisimba, First Secretary, Permanent Mission of Zambia to the UN and other international organizations in Geneva

Zambia further stressed that humanitarian disarmament including mine action is not only a technical undertaking, but a humanitarian imperative, adding that “behind every clearance target and compliance deadline are communities seeking safety, dignity and the opportunity to live free from the threat of landmines.”

Juan Carlos Ruan, Director of the APMBC Implementation Support Unit, also highlighted the initiative’s contribution to strengthening the overall functioning of the convention. This includes cooperation between States Parties in meeting legal obligations related to Article 5 and commitments. It also means generating lessons that can inform broader discussions to strengthen cooperation and assistance, as well as progress of the Siem Reap–Angkor Action Plan (2025–2029).

Delivering practical results and shared knowledge

The project combines research, analytical and knowledge-exchange with operational components. Key core activities will include:

• joint initial review meetings with national authorities,
• joint piloting and use of a prioritization tool, and
• upon request support in the preparation of annual reports.

Key optional and context-specific activities may include:

• surveys;
• clearance operations; and
• institutional and operational capacity-building provided by MAG (such as for example in information management, national standards, explosive ordnance risk education and community liaison).

At the same time, UNIDIR and its partners will document lessons and facilitate exchanges among African States Parties and the wider international community. This includes:

• a knowledge-exchange workshop and report,
• development of a prioritization tool,
• publication of country-specific factsheets and analytical outputs,
• co-hosting and organization of events in the margins of regional and international forum both in multilateral Geneva and in African countries.

Over the next three years, activities will focus on delivering concrete clearance outcomes, strengthening national systems, and generating actionable knowledge for the community of policy and practice. Partners also intend to engage regularly with European and African States Parties, regional organizations, and international stakeholders to share progress and findings, including through side events at future APMBC meetings, the conference of states parties, and regional outreach in Africa. Thus, the beneficiaries will not only be the five States, but also other APMBC States Parties, and the international community at large.

Looking ahead

During the initial phase, UNIDIR and MAG will hold joint review meetings with national authorities of the five States. The aim is to support States Parties in identifying, further prioritizing and sequencing assistance to fulfil Article 5 obligations. This should help move from broad expressions of needs towards structured, prioritized and nationally owned plans that can also inform individualized approaches, international assistance requests, and future cooperation.

The initiative also aims to enable States and the continent to take ownership in fulfilling Article 5 obligations and commit to shared responsibilities in working towards a mine-free Africa.

Other States in Africa and beyond face significant Article 5 challenges and require sustained international cooperation and assistance. This initiative and dedicated project is therefore a first, targeted, and focused contribution. It may become a vehicle and has the potential to generate further interest, support and resources to achieve mine-free objectives. Additional resources allowed expanding the geographical scope of the project or the type and depth of support that could be provided.

By working together, governments, regional organizations, implementing partners, donors, and affected communities, can make significant progress.

Mulima Lisimba, First Secretary, Permanent Mission of Zambia to the UN and other international organizations in Geneva

The post New initiative paves the way towards a mine-free Africa first appeared on UNIDIR.

Held at the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific, the workshop brought together representatives from across the Government of Thailand to explore practical approaches for translating international commitments into national policies, institutional processes and operational practices. It builds on a series of similar bilateral trainings UNIDIR has already delivered in Thailand and across the region in Indonesia, Lao PDR, Malaysia, Pakistan, and the Philippines.

Building on a long-standing partnership

UNIDIR has worked with Thailand for several years to support the development of cyber resilience. In May 2025, a joint cyber capacity-building and policy training featured an interactive tabletop exercise simulating a major ICT incident. The objective was to test national coordination, decision-making, and response arrangements.

This exercise helped identify a number of practical actions to strengthen cyber resilience.

UNIDIR and Thailand then worked together to develop a national roadmap to address priority issues in greater depth, and support implementation of specific elements of the UN framework of responsible State behaviour in cyberspace.

Co-developing implementation-focused support

As a part of this broader initiative, in July 2026 UNIDIR in collaboration with the NSC, NCSA and MFA designed a follow up workshop tailored specifically to Thailand’s priorities and institutional context. The training focused on translating select elements of the UN framework into national policies, processes and practices suited to Thailand’s specific context.

This approach reflects the capacity-building principles set out by the Open-ended Working Group on ICT Security: support should be demand-driven, context-specific, developed with national partners, non-duplicative and building on previous engagement. By adapting programme design to nationally identified priorities, UNIDIR’s activities are built to support long-term implementation of the UN framework rather than functioning as standalone training events.

Bringing together the national cyber governance community

Effective implementation of the UN framework requires coordination across government. To support this, the recent workshop brought together representatives from Thailand’s technical, legal and diplomatic communities.

Through expert briefings, policy dialogues and simulated tabletop exercises, participants explored how different institutions can contribute to implementing the UN framework while building synergies across Thailand’s national cyber governance ecosystem.

The workshop provided a platform for cross-sector dialogue, enabling participants to examine implementation challenges around specific UN cyber norms from complementary technical, legal and policy perspectives.

Looking ahead

This workshop represents the latest milestone in the Institute’s ongoing partnership with Thailand and broader capacity-building efforts in Asia-Pacific, delivered through UNIDIR’s Security and Technology Programme. It reflects a shared commitment to translating the UN framework for responsible State behaviour in cyberspace from principle into national policy and practice.

UNIDIR will continue working with Thailand and other Member States through practical, tailored capacity-building activities that strengthen national cyber resilience while contributing to regional cooperation and a more stable, secure and peaceful cyberspace.

For further information on UNIDIR’s research-based training and capacity building initiatives, visit the UNIDIR Academy.

This project is funded by Global Affairs Canada under its Indo-Pacific Strategy.

The post UNIDIR and Thailand advance national implementation of UN cyber norms first appeared on UNIDIR.

Mirroring a similarly diverse multi-stakeholder visit to Mongolia earlier this year, the visit deepened UNIDIR’s existing relationships in the People’s Republic of China and created opportunities to build new collaborations.

Strong partnerships are at the heart of effective multilateral dialogue and forward-looking research. They are one of four key enablers in UNIDIR’s strategy and essential for the work of the Institute. The Beijing mission illustrates what that commitment looks like in practice, spanning three distinct constituencies: Member State authorities, research institutions, and private sector actors working on emerging technology.

Partnering with Member State authorities

Sustained dialogue with UN Member States remains central to UNIDIR’s work. It reinforces the Institute’s unique role as a trusted partner and convening actor, especially in times of rising global tensions.

Beyond its regular exchanges with permanent missions in Geneva, UNIDIR places particular value on engagement with national stakeholders at the capital level, where policy is shaped.

In Beijing, UNIDIR Director held discussions with Ambassador Lu Kang, Vice Minister of the International Department of the Chinese Communist Party Central Committee. UNIDIR also met with representatives of the Department of Disarmament Affairs at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China, and engaged with the organizers of the Beijing Xiangshan Forum – a leading platform for international security dialogue.

Across these bilateral discussions, Dr Geiss highlighted UNIDIR’s recently launched Centre of Excellence on AI, Peace and Security as a concrete mechanism through which the Institute can support Member States’ capacity-building needs.

These conversations also provided an opportunity to exchange on issues of shared concern and discuss pathways for strengthening international dialogue, themes that are also emphasized by the Global Governance Initiative.

Expanding the research partner network

Research institutes, think tanks, and academia form another essential pillar of UNIDIR’s partnership approach. The Institute’s work draws on in-house expertise and continuous exchange with a vast network of research partners to build on diverse perspectives. A key initiative reflecting this commitment is UNIDIR’s Global Disarmament Research Network, which brings together experts and institutions worldwide to address shared security challenges.

In Beijing, UNIDIR formalized its long-standing collaboration with the Centre for International Security and Strategy (CISS) by signing a partnership agreement with Tsinghua University. The agreement builds on an existing relationship through CISS Deputy Director Xiao Qian’s membership in UNIDIR’s Roundtable for AI, Security and Ethics – the sole multistakeholder platform convening experts from all permanent members of the Security Council and all UN regional groups.

This relationship is further reflected in UNIDIR’s hosting of Fellow Lefeng Zheng, an established form of engagement that was well received by Chinese counterparts throughout the mission.

During the visit, UNIDIR Director delivered a Global Vision Lecture on AI at the crossroads of peace and security, co-hosted by Tsinghua’s Office of International Affairs and CISS, engaging early-career scholars on current security challenges. Discussions continued at a youth dialogue with a smaller group of Tsinghua researchers and students. CISS and UNIDIR also jointly organized a symposium on artificial intelligence and international security, examining associated risks, opportunities and persisting governance gaps.

UNIDIR also participated in the 14th World Peace Forum, where Dr Geiss took part in a panel on the use of unmanned systems in armed conflict, organized by the International Committee of the Red Cross Regional Delegation in East Asia. Yasmin Afina, Researcher in UNIDIR’s Security and Technology Programme, also moderated a closed-door panel discussion on AI and international security, for which Dr Geiss provided opening remarks.

Beyond Tsinghua University, UNIDIR Director met with the senior leadership of the China Arms Control and Disarmament Association, including Dai Huaicheng, Secretary-General and member of UNIDIR’s Board of Trustees, to discuss ongoing collaboration. A welcome dinner hosted by the Chinese People’s Institute of Foreign Affairs provided further opportunity for exchange with its representatives.

Engaging the private sector

Private sector engagement is increasingly important to UNIDIR’s research, particularly on AI, cyberspace and other emerging technologies. As innovation accelerates, dialogue with industry provides valuable insights into developments shaping the future security landscape.

UNIDIR visited two Beijing-based AI companies for discussions on peace and security, ensuring the Institute’s research remains grounded in current technological realities.

Supporting forward-looking research

UNIDIR’s recent engagements in Beijing demonstrate how the Institute’s partnerships – with governments, research institutions and industry – inform research that is both evidence-based and responsive to a fast-changing security environment.

As artifical intelligence and other emerging technologies continue to reshape questions of international peace and security, this kind of sustained, multi-stakeholder approach will remain at the core of UNIDIR’s ability to deliver relevant, forward-looking analysis.

The post UNIDIR advances partnerships on AI, peace and security in Beijing first appeared on UNIDIR.

This year’s programme provided the Institute’s growing network of Women in AI fellows with grounding in the technical, legal, governance and ethical dimensions of AI, particularly in terms of its applications in international peace and security. The training enabled participants to navigate present and future challenges around emerging technologies.

A programme across the AI spectrum

Through expert-led lectures, interactive sessions, and tabletop exercises, the programme reflected the breadth and diversity of both its participants and its subject matter. Fellows explored AI across multiple dimensions – the technological foundation of AI and biases, military applications and international humanitarian law, and multilateral approaches to advancing AI governance.

Discussions extended to AI’s place in the broader international defence architecture, strategic foresight around its use, and the growing policy relevance of the nexus of emerging technologies like AI and cybersecurity. Fellows were also introduced to broader considerations and implications of military AI, including through the lenses of human rights, gender considerations, responsible AI and ethics, as well as multistakeholder and regional perspectives from across Africa, Asia-Pacific, Latin America, and Europe.

UNIDIR actively leads initiatives to strengthen knowledge and dialogue on the governance of military AI. This fellowship reflects the Institute’s key priority of ensuring that women can participate meaningfully in shaping these discussions.

Robin Geiss, UNIDIR Director

The training allowed fellows to engage with UNIDIR experts, intergovernmental organizations, diplomats and policymakers, academia, industry representatives, military personnel, and high-level officials such as the UN Under-Secretary-General and High Representative for Disarmament Affairs, Izumi Nakamitsu. The substantive bedrock of the sessions drew from a range of research and robust work across several countries and organizations. The programme covered the broad spectrum of UNIDIR’s work on AI, including dialogues like the upcoming Global Conference on AI, Security and Ethics, digital tools like the AI Policy Portal, and research on the cyber-AI nexus, military AI governance processes, confidence-building around military AI, and the intersection of gender and AI. 

Apart from thematic sessions, the programme also included interactive tabletop exercises on the governance of military AI, a strategic foresight activity on AI, a screening and discussion of the Netflix documentary Unknown: Killer Robots, and structured daily mini-lateral discussions amongst the participants.

The fellowship also factored in opportunities for networking, including a speed-friending lunch with UNIDIR’s Women in AI Fellows from previous years as well as a dinner with the diplomatic community in Geneva. The final day included a visit to the CERN Science Gateway on the Franco-Swiss border, where fellows took a guided walking tour of the premises, learnt about emerging technologies in use at CERN, and had the chance to witness up close the functioning of a successful, science and technology-focused organization born out of international cooperation.

Fellows provided overwhelmingly positive feedback at the end of the week. Participants highlighted the importance of inclusive and well-informed approaches to AI governance, in particular the need to integrate human rights and gender perspectives while strengthening links between technical and policy communities. They also pointed to the value of sustained capacity-building, multistakeholder engagement, and the exchange of good practices to support international cooperation, drawing on lessons from existing governance processes in areas such as cybersecurity.

The way ahead

As AI becomes an established issue domain in disarmament as well as international peace and security, interest in UNIDIR’s Women in AI Fellowship has grown rapidly, with the 2026 edition receiving over 200 applications from 100 countries – the most diverse application pool thus far. UNIDIR is building on this momentum by expanding its capacity-building offerings and exploring opportunities to deliver the fellowship across additional regional contexts.

Uncertainty is not an impediment for governance.

UNIDIR Women in AI Fellow

The 2026 Women in AI Fellowship was made possible by the generous support of donors to UNIDIR’s Integrated Approaches Programme and UNIDIR’s Security and Technology Programme, specifically Canada, Czechia, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Malta, the Netherlands, Norway, the Republic of Korea, Spain, Switzerland, and Microsoft.

The post Advancing representative and inclusive AI governance with UNIDIR’s Women in AI Fellowship first appeared on UNIDIR.

Over six days, a team composed of diverse representatives (from UNIDIR, Interpeace, the Small Arms Survey, the Regional Centre for Small Arms Control, Kenya’s Ministry of Interior, National Defence University-Kenya, NEPCOH and local county authorities) conducted focus group discussions, stakeholder consultations, and community meetings. These took place in both urban centres and remote hotspots in Samburu, Baringo, Turkana, Elgeyo Marakwet, and West Pokot, where the State’s reach is limited and the presence of illicit weapons is not.

The team interacted with county commissioners, peace directors, National Police Service officers, elders, youth, women, and religious leaders. The findings were highly illuminating. In the Suguta Valley, one elder told the delegation:

Guns have brought more harm than good to our families. Nearly every home has lost someone.

Across all five counties, communities consistently identified three conditions for sustainable disarmament:

• simultaneous action across borders;
• credible post-surrender security guarantees; and
• concrete links between arms control and livelihood support.

Five counties, one picture

Meetings in Maralal, Samburu County, painted a detailed picture of the local security landscape, highlighting the linkages between livestock wealth, raiding and firearms possession. For households living more than ten kilometres from urban centres, guns are considered essential for protection.

A focus group with elders, youth, teachers, religious leaders, and local administrators in Suguta Valley in Turkana County’s Kapedo area highlighted:

• the widespread presence of firearms among young people;
• the uneven effects of Operation Maliza Uhalifu; and
• the urgent need for simultaneous disarmament across neighbouring communities.

The message was clear: unilateral community disarmament is perceived not as a pre-condition for peace, but as exposure and vulnerability.

In Baringo County, community members in Tangulbei and Kolowa in the Kerio Valley traced the roots of arms proliferation to cross-border inflows from Uganda during the 1970s and 1990s. They also reflected on recent voluntary arms surrenders, which followed the arrest of several high-profile individuals in neighbouring areas. That momentum reportedly contributed to the surrender of more than 100 weapons locally, reinforcing an important lesson from the field: accountability at higher levels can create space for meaningful community action.

In West Pokot County, County Commissioner, D.N. Saruni noted that 99% of recovered firearms had been voluntarily surrendered. This is a striking figure that underscores the potential of trust-based approaches to arms control. Community dialogues in Sigor and Orwa-Calabash brought together Pokot and Marakwet participants to share lessons learned and impact from joint farming initiatives between youth from both communities to build trust and cooperation.

What comes next

This first CLAC mission will directly inform the development of UNIDIR’s broader effort to develop a practical “menu of options” for use in community-led arms control initiatives across the globe. UNIDIR’s role in this process reflects its wider commitment to evidence- based and people-centred approaches to conventional arms control connecting global policy discussions to the everyday realities faced by communities most affected by insecurity and armed violence.

The post Kenyan communities break silence on small arms and insecurity first appeared on UNIDIR.

As advances in AI raise increasingly complex questions for policymakers, regulators and international institutions alike, States and stakeholders are seeking shared understandings, common norms and coordinated approaches that can support responsible governance across security and defence contexts.

This growing momentum is reflected in an expanding ecosystem of international and regional initiatives. Recent developments, including the UN General Assembly resolutions 79/239 and 80/58, the Secretary-General’s report on AI in the military domain, REAIM and a growing number of national and regional AI strategies, point to a broader shift from abstract debates toward implementation, practical governance measures and sustained multilateral engagement.

At the same time, the pace of technological innovation continues to challenge existing policy frameworks, making international cooperation and cross-sector dialogue increasingly necessary.

Amid this rapidly evolving landscape, UNIDIR’s Global Conference on AI, Security and Ethics 2026 (AISE26) served as an agile and inclusive space for bridging technical and policy communities and strengthening cooperative approaches to AI-related security challenges.

A platform for dialogue

The inaugural edition of the conference took place in March 2025, against a highly dynamic backdrop. Policymakers and regulators worldwide had begun to recognize the urgency of shared understandings, norms and regulations that transcend national borders and individual interests, including in the context of AI’s applications for security and defence.

In parallel, AI in the military and security domains were often, if not most of the times discussed at either end of the spectrum: as a question of governance, international law and global norms, or as a question of technical design and corporate governance.

In response, UNIDIR leveraged its existing network of experts – building on the work of the Roundtable for AI, Security and Ethics (RAISE) launched in 2024 – and giving a voice to under-represented perspectives from all five UN regional groups in an inclusive manner that transcends geopolitical barriers.

As such, UNIDIR’s Global Conference on AI, Security and Ethics constituted a platform for independent, neutral and expert-led dialogue.

By fostering mutual understanding and cross-sectoral action, it established itself as a channel for substantive input feeding into multilateral, international, regional and national governance initiatives. The conference was also held ahead of the deadline for the submission of States’ and the multistakeholder community’s views to the UN Secretary-General pursuant to resolution 79/239 on AI in the military domain and its implications for international peace and security.

Unwavering commitment to AI and security

UNIDIR’s conference is also part of the Institute’s broader work on AI and autonomy. This explores these technologies’ evolution, their applications and implications on international, regional and national peace and security, and the policy options available to respond effectively – informing both the deliberations on lethal autonomous weapons systems and broader discussions on military AI.

Recent projects include the co-development with OHCHR of a voluntary framework that provides guidelines for industry actors in AI in the military domain. Acknowledging the private sector’s increasingly important role throughout these technologies’ lifecycle, UNIDIR seeks to collaborate with organizations, industry actors, civil society and Member States to formulate guidelines translating existing international law and norms into measures for their implementation and operationalization.

The Institute emphasizes regional engagement for the responsible development, deployment and use of AI in the military domain and for the application of international humanitarian law in relation to lethal autonomous weapons systems. It does so while preserving an inherently inter-disciplinary approach due to the multi-faceted nature of these technologies. This is reflected in its work surrounding large language models, decommissioning, as well as the publication of its roadmap encapsulating the Institute’s recommendations for future policy action.

Additionally, given the growing number of national initiatives in this space, UNIDIR has developed, over the past years, tools for furthering national capacity. These include its AI Policy Portal, which fosters transparency and information-sharing, and is complemented by the Draft Guidelines for the Development of a National Strategy on AI in Security and Defence. In addition, UNIDIR’s Women in AI Fellowship, taking place annually in Geneva, equips women diplomats with the expertise to explore the latest and emerging AI applications from policy, legal and technical lens.

What’s next for AI, security and ethics

UNIDIR’s Global Conference on AI, Security and Ethics 2026 convened policymakers, diplomats, military representatives, industry leaders, researchers, academia and civil society to address the evolving implications of AI for international security and resilience.

Held on 18–19 June at the Palais des Nations in Geneva, and online, the conference served as a catalyst for action at a pivotal moment for global AI governance.

By bringing together technical and policy communities from across sectors and regions, the conference reflected a shared commitment to a more secure world. Through an expanded programme featuring technical deep dives, high-level panels, interactive roundtables, demonstrations and poster presentations, it created space not only for dialogue across disciplines, but also for practical exchange between technical and policy communities.

In the lead-up this year’s edition, UNIDIR is also expanded these discussions through the Road to AISE26 webinar series and the launch of the AISE Markers policy notes. Together, these initiatives helped sustain dialogue ahead of the event, while identifying emerging questions, areas of convergence and issues that continue to require deeper reflection across policy and technical communities.

At a time when technological developments risk outpacing governance processes, spaces for inclusive, informed and action-oriented dialogue are critical. The governance of AI and its implications for international peace and security cannot be addressed in isolation. It requires sustained cooperation, shared understanding and continued engagement across the international community in the years ahead.

The post UNIDIR transcends geopolitical barriers on AI and security first appeared on UNIDIR.

The two-day training brought together 30 national officials from Angola’s ministries of defence, finance, human rights, and interior, as well as representatives of the armed forces, national police and customs authorities. It sought to improve reporting to the following international arms control instruments:

• the United Nations Global Framework for Through-life Conventional Ammunition Management (GFA);
• the United Nations Programme of Action on Small Arms and Light Weapons (PoA) and its International Tracing Instrument (ITI); and
• the United Nations Register of Conventional Arms (UNROCA).

During this workshop, it is expected that experiences, best practices, and technical knowledge will be shared to help improve the quality of national reports (…) [Reporting] serves as a diagnostic tool for assessing the current overall situation and for adjusting and enriching ongoing measures.

H.E. Marcos Correia, Secretary of State for the Protection of Strategic Objectives of the Ministry of Defence

Dr Paul Holtom, Head of UNIDIR’s Conventional Weapons Programme, noted that by helping States and other stakeholders to fulfil their commitments and obligations under conventional arms and ammunition control instruments: “We can help to build confidence and trust between States, reduce tensions around arms, and foster peace, security, stability and sustainable development.“

From capacity-building to concrete progress

The workshop focused on the practical steps required for Angola to prepare its national reports. Experts examined the types of data and information to be reported under each instrument, identified which national institutions hold relevant information, and considered how stronger inter-agency coordination can support reporting processes.

Participants developed first drafts of guidance for national reporting procedures and kick-started the process of developing Angola’s national reports for the GFA, PoA/ITI and UNROCA. Experts also discussed implementation gaps and identified national priorities for international cooperation and assistance.

ANCAD timed the workshop to support Angola’s broader arms control efforts, as highlighted by H.E. Marcos Correia:

This initiative, carried out in strategic partnership with UNIDIR, forms part of the sector’s Biennial Action Plan for the Implementation of Arms Control Instruments, aimed above all at strengthening the national system for controlling arms of all types and categories by enhancing the capacity of relevant institutions, adapting existing legislation, and training personnel, based on international standards, recommendations, and best practices.

The workshop enhanced Angola’s engagement with international obligations and processes; supported a systematic stocktaking of national progress and challenges; and provided additional momentum to strengthen its legal framework through the development of a new Law on the Control of Conventional Arms and Ammunition and Related Materials.

Looking ahead

UNIDIR and Angola will continue to explore opportunities for cooperation to strengthen national arms and ammunition control. As Dr Holtom noted:

We hope that this capacity-building workshop is the first of many opportunities to work together to counter the threats posed by unregulated and illicit weapons to communities and the State of Angola.

The workshop forms part of UNIDIR’s broader efforts to support States in building sustainable, nationally owned capacities for effective reporting. Through its Conventional Weapons Programme, UNIDIR provides tailored advice and capacity-building to help States fulfil their commitments under international instruments on conventional arms and ammunition control.

The post UNIDIR and Angola strengthen arms transparency and control first appeared on UNIDIR.

Participants identified quantum sensing technologies, notably magnetometers and gravimeters, as among the most relevant near-term developments in the nuclear context. Ballistic missile submarines are generally considered highly survivable due to their low detectability. They play a crucial role in strategic deterrence, but advances in quantum sensing could eventually challenge this long-held assumption.

Quantum magnetometers can detect the subtle magnetic disturbances generated by submarines with sensitivity that, in certain configurations, could exceed that of current classical magnetic detection systems. Yet, the field is still relatively underexplored and many anticipated capabilities remain largely theoretical. Current technologies are constrained by hard limits on detection range, particularly in real-world conditions where noise and interference challenges are present. In parallel, detection-evasion techniques continue to evolve alongside advances in detection technologies.

As a stabilizing counterpoint, quantum-assisted navigation could enhance the survivability of sea-based deterrents by enabling submarines to operate for longer periods without surfacing. The overall assessment, however, remains uncertain as evidence based on operational performance remains thin.

Whether quantum advances ultimately have a stabilizing or destabilizing effect on nuclear deterrence will depend heavily on how relevant capabilities evolve and they are pursued by States.

Emerging quantum cyberthreats

Modern digital communications rely heavily on public-key encryption methods. Their security is based on mathematical problems that sufficiently powerful future quantum computers may eventually be able to solve, potentially rendering current protections insufficient. This could create risks for nuclear-related digital systems where information confidentiality, authentication and integrity are essential. For instance, future quantum computers may enable adversaries to compromise the encryption used to secure sensitive nuclear information.

While quantum computers capable of breaking current encryption schemes do not yet exist, there is already concern that adversaries may collect encrypted data today with the intent to decrypt it once the technology matures.

For nuclear systems whose operational data could retain value for decades, the consequences of the so-called “harvest now, decrypt later” attacks can be particularly grave.

Toward quantum-resilient nuclear architectures

In response to quantum cyberthreats, two complementary approaches were identified:

• Post-quantum cryptography (PQC): It is designed to resist both classical and quantum cyberattacks, and can already be deployed on existing systems. A notable example is the set of PQC standards released in 2024 by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology.
• Quantum key distribution (QKD): It is one of the most mature quantum technologies currently available. QKD enables encryption keys to be distributed in a way that makes intrusion attempts detectable.

UNIDIR’s event presented insights from an experimental demonstration conducted by Purdue University on QKD integration within a nuclear reactor control environment. The experiment suggested that QKD could be compatible with latency-sensitive nuclear control architectures and has the potential of addressing the nuclear sector’s stringent confidentiality standards.

Experts highlighted a layered approach combining PQC and QKD, alongside zero-trust architecture and hardware-based security, as a promising direction for strengthening future nuclear system design. However, modernization of nuclear systems is likely to proceed gradually. Their complexity could make rapid cryptographic and infrastructure upgrades difficult, potentially prolonging the window of vulnerability.

Multilateral engagement and the path forward

To date, quantum technologies remain a relatively nascent topic within multilateral nuclear disarmament discussions. Nevertheless, it is important to prepare for potential implications before the relevant technologies mature.

One key issue raised during UNIDIR’s multistakeholder dialogue was that quantum technologies should not be considered in isolation, as their interaction with other emerging technologies – such as AI – could shorten decision-making timelines, increase uncertainty, and elevate the risk of miscalculation during crises. On the positive side, quantum technologies could offer opportunities to strengthen nuclear disarmament efforts through improved verification enabled by quantum sensing and through quantum-secured communications.

The discussion emphasized that awareness among relevant stakeholders must be built to support informed multilateral deliberations.

UNIDIR’s Science and Technology Watchtower project seeks to contribute to such awareness-raising efforts, and this dialogue represented one step forward in bringing the quantum-nuclear nexus onto the disarmament community’s agenda. Previous events under the project’s umbrella have explored issues surrounding additive manufacturing, uncrewed systems, cybersecurity, AI and the Biological Weapons Convention, and more.

The post UNIDIR advances dialogue on the quantum-nuclear nexus first appeared on UNIDIR.

Moderated by UNIDIR Director, Robin Geiss, the discussion featured opening remarks by the Mayor of Hiroshima and President of Mayors for Peace, Kazumi Matsui, who highlighted the importance of nuclear disarmament. He was followed by UN High Representative for Disarmament Affairs, Izumi Nakamitsu, who emphasized that the review conference represents a significant opportunity for State Parties and in particular nuclear-weapon States to reaffirm their commitments under the treaty.

Minister Kimitake Nakamura, Director-General of the Disarmament, Non-Proliferation and Science Department at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, reaffirmed Japan’s commitment to the NPT. He highlighted the importance of the disarmament and non-proliferation education as a key tool for promoting a world without nuclear weapons, especially for the younger generation.

Examining the state of the three pillars

Dr Chen Zak Kane, Head of UNIDIR’s Middle East WMD-Free Zone Project covered the non-proliferation pillar, noting that this is an area where the treaty’s tools have been most visibly tested. She stressed the importance of universalizing Comprehensive Safeguards Agreements and Additional Protocols and ensuring that the International Atomic Energy Agency has the resources to implement them effectively. She also emphasized the need for safeguards to adapt to emerging technologies. While AI could lower barriers to WMD development, real constraints remain on how far it enables new actors to build nuclear weapons.

Turning to the peaceful uses of nuclear energy, Dr Shun Oshita, a Senior Lecturer with the Hiroshima Peace Institute, argued that Article IV has historically served as a “built‑in stabilizer” for the NPT’s “grand bargain”. However, there was a risk that this was leading to the stagnation of nuclear disarmament. He argued that the “good faith” obligations of Article VI must be scrutinized potentially through some form of institutional body. 

Focusing on nuclear disarmament, Dr Randy Rydell, Honorary Advisor at Mayors for Peace drew attention to the fundamental “principles” that the UN General Assembly adopted to guide the negotiation of the treaty. He also highlighted some of the persistent challenges of implementing disarmament commitments. While recognizing that Article VI is not the only legal instrument to advance disarmament, he stressed the extent that the entire treaty depends on demonstrable fulfilment of these obligations – as observed at its review conferences.

What to expect from the review conference

During the discussion, the panellists and audience members discussed possible outcomes of the review conference. Participants also discussed the importance of nuclear weapons States demonstrating good faith in their commitment to the treaty, as well as the possibility of convening a fourth Special Session of the UN General Assembly on Disarmament if the NPT Review Conference fails.

The event was part of an ongoing partnership between UNIDIR and Mayors for Peace, as well as of a dynamic series of side events organized by UNIDIR and its partners during the 2026 NPT Review Conference. These events aimed to enhance understanding of key issues and deepen engagement with processes, procedures and potential outcomes.

The post Taking stock of the Non-Proliferation Treaty at a pivotal moment first appeared on UNIDIR.

Every year, on 23 April, the UN celebrates International Girls in ICT Day. This year’s theme “AI for Development: Girls Shaping the Digital Future” draws attention to the digital gender divide: How can we ensure that AI benefits everyone when 90% of adolescent girls and young women in low-income countries are offline? If not developed responsibly, AI technology risks perpetuating and reinforcing gendered inequalities through unequal access, biased algorithms and new forms of AI-enabled digital harm.

An important step for addressing these issues is to ensure that women diplomats, who remain under-represented in multilateral cyber governance forums, have a seat at the decision-making table. Every year, UNIDIR organizes the Women in AI Fellowship and the Women in Cyber Fellowship, bringing together women diplomats from across the world working on AI and cybersecurity for week-long trainings. The fellowships are part of UNIDIR’s broader effort to contribute to women’s meaningful participation in international security.

Q: How does your work relate to AI and/or cybersecurity? And how do you see your role as a diplomat in shaping the digital future?  

A: My work sits at the intersection of technology, security and global governance. As a diplomat, I contribute to building international consensus on how artificial intelligence and digital technologies should be developed and used in a responsible, ethical and secure manner.  

I see my role as that of a translator between different worlds: the technical, the political, and the human.

Ultimately, the digital future is not defined only by what technology can do, but by what we decide as societies it should do. From Chile, I seek to bring a perspective that places people, their rights and their dignity at the centre, ensuring that digital transformation becomes a tool to reduce inequalities rather than deepen them. 

Q: What aspects of the UNIDIR Women in AI Fellowship and/or Women in Cyber Fellowship have been most helpful to you and how?

A: One of the most transformative aspects of these fellowships has been the opportunity to connect with amazing women from different regions and professional backgrounds, all sharing a common conviction: that we can and want to actively shape more inclusive technological futures.

Beyond technical knowledge, I particularly value the space to question assumptions and enrich discussions through interdisciplinary perspectives. For example, through the fellowships I was able to more effectively integrate ethical and gender considerations into discussions on security and emerging technologies, strengthening my ability to contribute more holistically in multilateral settings.

Q: Which emerging challenge related to AI or cybersecurity concerns you the most – and why?

A: I am deeply concerned about the pace at which these technologies are advancing compared to our collective ability to govern them. In particular, the risk that artificial intelligence may reproduce or amplify existing inequalities, often in ways that are not immediately visible.

I have worked in regulating tech my entire professional career and as regulators, we are always lagging behind. AI is a whole new challenge as it revolutionizes multiple sectors at the same time, making it very hard for current governing structures and institutions to follow up.

I am also concerned about the increasing autonomy of certain systems in sensitive contexts, such as security and defence. This raises fundamental questions:

Where do we draw the line? How do we ensure accountability? And, above all, how do we guarantee that these technologies remain in service of people?

Perhaps even more fundamentally, I often ask myself whether we will be able to collectively prioritize what truly matters. In an international context that frequently incentivizes competition – technological, economic and strategic – the real challenge lies in achieving the agreements needed to establish shared principles and limits. The question is not only what we can do with these technologies, but whether we will have the collective will to ensure that their development serves the common good, rather than narrow interests.

Q: What do you think are the biggest barriers to women and girls’ meaningful participation in the digital space?

A: The barriers are not only about access, but also about perception and confidence. Many girls and young women grow up without seeing themselves reflected in these spaces, or they grow up feeling that they do not belong.

These challenges are compounded by structural inequalities in education, opportunities and access to digital tools, as well as online environments that are not always safe or welcoming. Addressing these barriers requires not only public policy, but also deeper cultural change. And most of all, it requires strong networks of professionals inspiring and supporting each other.

Q: What advice would you share with girls and young women aspiring to contribute to AI and cybersecurity governance?

A: I would tell them that curiosity is a form of courage. Asking questions, exploring, making mistakes, and trying again are all essential parts of the journey.

But above all, I would remind them of something they should never lose sight of: technology is not an end in itself. Any innovation that truly matters must be, at its core, by and for people. It should improve lives, expand opportunities, and protect what makes us human.

They do not need to fit into a predefined mold to contribute to this field. Their perspectives, experiences, and questions are exactly what is needed to build a more just digital future. I would encourage them to step forward, to make their voices heard, and to imagine different kinds of technologies: more inclusive, more ethical, and more human-centred. Technology that reflects and supports their needs and dreams.

Q: Any final thoughts on girls’ and women’s empowerment in the digital space?

A: Digital empowerment is not only about access, but also about agency… the ability to influence, decide and transform. It is not just about increasing the number of women in technology, but about ensuring that they can shape how these technologies are designed, implemented and governed.

If we truly integrate diverse perspectives, we will not only close gaps, but we will also build better technologies. Because a more inclusive digital future is not only fairer; it is also more innovative and sustainable.

The post Women shaping our digital future first appeared on UNIDIR.

This marked the first time UNIDIR was invited to present its work as a cooperation partner of SOMTC-Cambodia during the open session of the Working Group on Arms Smuggling. The Institute delivered the presentation to delegations from ASEAN Member States and representatives of the ASEAN Secretariat.

UNIDIR highlighted two areas for potential cooperation:

1. It presented outcomes from the capacity-building on reporting under international instruments on conventional arms and ammunition control, held in Phnom Penh.
2. It highlighted policy-relevant research on emerging production methods and knowledge transfers related to improvised weapons, including collaborations with organizations and experts in Southeast Asia.

This event was a landmark for deepening cooperation between UNIDIR and its partners across the region, particularly with Cambodia as the SOMTC voluntary lead shepherd for the arms smuggling priority area. UNIDIR’s Conventional Weapons Programme reiterated its commitment to supporting the efforts of SOMTC-Cambodia and the SOMTC Working Group on Arms Smuggling to curb the illicit smuggling of firearms and its ammunition.

ASEAN’s approach to preventing arms smuggling

The ASEAN Declaration on Combating Arms Smuggling was adopted on 21 August 2023 in Labuan Bajo, Indonesia. The declaration recognizes the pervasive threats of arms smuggling in Southeast Asia and the challenges in preventing and curbing cross-border illicit trade and smuggling of firearms and its ammunition.

The ASEAN SOMTC Working Group on Arms Smuggling meets annually and serves as a dedicated platform for Member States to exchange views on challenges, share best practices, and identify practical solutions related to arms smuggling. The Working Group plays a central role in supporting the implementation of the declaration. It is also a forum for ASEAN Member States and invited dialogue partners to seize opportunities for collaboration on capacity-building, training and information-sharing to enhance regional responses to arms smuggling.

The post Advancing cooperation against arms smuggling in Southeast Asia first appeared on UNIDIR.

Organized by UNIDIR’s Security and Technology Programme, the training sought to strengthen Malaysia’s cyber resilience by promoting greater alignment and cooperation among key national actors. It also advanced efforts to operationalize the UN cyber norms and address the growing need for demand-driven and responsive capacity-building, as highlighted by the UN Open-Ended Working Group on ICT Security. 

Ranging from the rapid growth of ransomware to supply-chain compromises and AI-enabled disinformation, the training addressed the evolving cyber threat landscape and the practical challenges of responding to high-impact ICT incidents. Participants gained a comprehensive picture of how cyber threats can disrupt critical infrastructure and services through scenario-based and multi-stage table-top exercises by applying UNIDIR Taxonomy of Malicious ICT Incidents. The dedicated policy briefings highlighted how recent advancements and trends in quantum computing and artificial intelligence are expected to reshape cybersecurity and broader security dynamics.

Aligning national capabilities with UN frameworks

By featuring extensive discussions on the role of UN voluntary cyber norms and developing a national position on the interpretation of international law, the training helped advance Malaysia’s long-term cyber resilience.

In addition to the UNIDIR’s Foundational Cyber Capabilities Framework, the programme introduced strategic approaches that decision-makers may consider for responding to malicious ICT incidents and de-escalating tensions with potentially significant impacts on regional security and stability. These included:

• diplomatic engagement,
• acts of retorsion,
• countermeasures, and
• the activation of confidence-building measures.

An interactive session led by the International Telecommunication Union complemented these discussions, sharing good practices and practical tools for integrating the UN framework in the development of the national cybersecurity strategies.

Towards stronger regional cyber resilience

This training forms part of a growing regional series of bilateral trainings – also held in Pakistan, the Philippines, Indonesia, Lao PDR, and Thailand – aimed at reinforcing national and regional cybersecurity capacities. UNIDIR remains committed to supporting governments with tailored tools and training, enabling them to respond effectively to rapidly evolving threats in the ICT environment. 

To learn more about UNIDIR’s research-driven training and capacity-building programmes, visit the UNIDIR Academy. 

This project is funded by Global Affairs Canada under its Indo-Pacific Strategy.

The post UNIDIR builds national cyber resilience in Malaysia first appeared on UNIDIR.

The workshop was designed to increase the awareness among national authorities on international conventional weapons instruments, strengthen their capacity to fulfill reporting commitments under them, and identify priority areas for enhanced international cooperation and assistance. It brought together some 40 government officials from Cambodia’s capital and border provinces involved in conventional arms and ammunition control and counter-trafficking efforts.

The workshop opened with a high-level address from H.E. Police General Por Phak, Secretary of State and Senior Officials Meeting on Transnational Crime (SOMTC) Cambodia Leader at the Ministry of Interior. He emphasized Cambodia’s commitment to strengthening national control systems and adapting to evolving global standards:

This [event] reflects our determination to fulfill our obligation and strengthen [our] national control system. At the same time, we are taking steps to align [with] emerging framework[s], including the Global Framework on Through-Life Conventional Ammunition Management, which require enhanced technical capacity and coordination. This workshop provides a timely opportunity to advance these efforts.

H.E. Pol. Gen. Por Phak, Secretary of State and SOMTC-Cambodia Leader, Ministry of Interior, Kingdom of Cambodia

Strengthening national reporting processes

The training focused on the institutionalization of effective inter-agency cooperation to collect and share the information needed for national reports on:

• The implementation of the UN Programme on Small Arms and Light Weapons (PoA) and the International Tracing Instrument (ITI)
• The implementation of the Global Framework on Through-Life Conventional Ammunition Management (GFA)
• International arms transfers for the UN Register on Conventional Weapons

UNIDIR experts Dr Paul Holtom, Head of Programme, and Joshua Angelo Bata, Associate Researcher, both with UNIDIR’s Conventional Weapons Programme, delivered presentations and facilitated group exercises. A highlight of the training was the process of drafting a “national procedures document” to support the institutionalization of reporting in Cambodia. This exercise entailed identifying “what” data and information is needed, “who” holds it, and “when” to collect, share, and prepare reports for each instrument.  

Enhancing the quality and use of reports

This training is timely as the UN Office for Disarmament Affairs has requested Member States to submit their national report on the implementation of the UN PoA and ITI in advance of the 2026 Biennial Meeting of States. In parallel, Member States are also requested to voluntarily submit their initial overview of the GFA implementation in 2026.

The two-day event, while national in scope, also included regional and global considerations.  Workshop participants not only explored how to ensure high-quality national reports but also identified issues on which Cambodia could share effective practices in implementing these instruments, as well as international cooperation and assistance needs.

Reporting on the implementation of conventional arms and ammunition control instruments helps to build confidence between States, reduce tensions relating to authorized and illicit arms flows, and support efforts to foster peace, security, stability and sustainable development.

Dr Paul Holtom, Head of UNIDIR’s Conventional Arms Programme

Supporting Cambodia’s regional leadership

The training also supports Cambodia in its role as the voluntary lead shepherd of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) SOMTC Working Group on Arms Smuggling. The workshop helped to show how preparing national reports for the PoA and GFA helps to review national legal frameworks related to manufacturing, trafficking and use of arms, as well as for data collection regarding illicit arms manufacturing and trafficking, in accordance with the ASEAN Declaration on Combating Arms Smuggling.

Experts from Non-Violence International Southeast Asia, Mitzi Austero and Dr Fred Lubang also contributed to the training by sharing the national experiences of ASEAN Member States regarding inter-agency cooperation.

The workshop forms part of UNIDIR’s broader efforts to support States in strengthening national systems and processes for reporting on international conventional weapons instruments. Through its Conventional Arms Programme, UNIDIR continues to deliver tailored advice and training to help States build sustainable, nationally owned capacities for effective and transparent reporting.

The post UNIDIR strengthens Cambodia’s capacity for conventional arms reporting first appeared on UNIDIR.

Describing the report as both “timely and necessary,” Dr Raymond Omollo, Principal Secretary at Kenya’s Ministry Interior and National Administration, emphasized its clear analysis of achievements and remaining gaps. “It provides a clear-eyed view of where we stand and what needs to be done,” he noted during the launch.

Presenting the key findings, Dr Paul Holtom, Head of UNIDIR’s Conventional Arms and Ammunition Programme, called the study a “milestone for combating the scourge of illicit small arms and light weapons and their misuse in eastern Africa.” He contrasted the region’s nascent national SALW control systems in 2005 with significant progress made by States by 2025.

In his remarks, Douglas Kanja, Inspector General of the Kenya National Police Service and President of the AFRIPOL General Assembly, highlighted the measurable gains in legislative and regulatory frameworks, stockpile management, marking, recordkeeping systems, and inter-agency coordination mechanisms.

Progress by the numbers

In 2005, no State in the region marked their weapons. By 2025, five States could confidently report that they had marked all State-owned SALW, with the remaining seven States assessed in the study making good progress.

We can say with confidence that the RECSA region has made remarkable and measurable progress.

Jean Pierre Betindji, RECSA’s Executive Secretary

Table: Progress made in marking and recordkeeping for SALW, 2005-2025

Despite the notable progress, persistent challenges remain. Dr Omollo cautioned that “the study equally and clearly captures persistent gaps.” Dr Holtom also highlighted continued challenges in implementing the Nairobi Protocol – especially concerning the mobilization of adequate resources, the operationalization of tracing mechanisms, border controls, law enforcement cooperation, and regional information exchange.

The proliferation of SALW in the region continues to fuel conflicts, to undermine development, and to threaten safety and security of our communities.

Felix Namurahonye, Inspector General of Police in Rwanda and Chair of RECSA’s Technical Advisory Committee

A roadmap for renewal

The report launch represents an important opportunity for States and key stakeholders to renew their commitment to addressing the illicit SALW trade in the region. It provides recommendations to revise the Nairobi Protocol’s provisions to:

• strengthen cross-border cooperation or national coordination mechanisms;
• align the protocol with relevant international and regional arms control frameworks; and
• take into account emerging weapon technologies posing a threat to peace and security in the region, including improvised explosive devices and armed uncrewed aerial vehicles.

RECSA has incorporated the report’s recommendations into its next five-year plan (2026-2031). It will present proposals to update the Nairobi Protocol and its best-practice guidelines to the Technical Advisory Committee, which will meet in Kigali, Rwanda next June. This represents an important first step toward translating the report’s findings into practical measures to prevent, combat and eradicate the illicit manufacturing, trafficking, possession and use of SALW in the region.

Revitalizing partnerships

Looking ahead, Dr Ivor Fung of the UN Office for Disarmament Affairs and Francis Wairagu of the Small Arms Survey both highlighted that to realize the new vision for the protocol, cooperation with international and regional organizations, civil society, academia and industry will need to be revitalized and enhanced. In this regard, Nerys Smith of the United Kingdom’s High Commission to Kenya expressed encouragement for these renewed efforts, stating: “We have a shared commitment to reduce human suffering and build a safer future in the region and the continent.”

The report on the Nairobi Protocol on SAWL at 20 is the final output of the joint UNIDIR-RECSA project, funded by the United Kingdom’s Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office. The report is intended to support RECSA Member States and Secretariat in responding to the call of RECSA’s 11^th Council of Ministers Meeting to review the Nairobi Protocol.

The post UNIDIR and RECSA unveil first regional scorecard on the Nairobi Protocol first appeared on UNIDIR.

Additive manufacturing builds objects layer by layer from digital files, enabling complex geometries, part consolidation, and on-demand production that conventional methods cannot match. The global market has grown exponentially in the past decade. Today, defence applications of additive manufacturing focus primarily on sustainment, including the production of non-critical components, tooling and spare parts, as well as repair and maintenance applications.

During UNIDIR’s multistakeholder dialogue, speakers cautioned against overstating the technology’s current reach. Additive manufacturing contributes to weapon systems mainly at the subsystem or component level. It does not enable the production of complete weapon systems.

The more consequential issue is not what machines can manufacture, but how the technology enables decentralized production and the transfer of intangible assets.

This includes digital files and build parameters, which is inherently difficult to monitor and control.

A shifting risk landscape

Intangible technology transfers represent the most acute governance gap. Build files shared across jurisdictions as part of routine business processes can constitute export control violations, while challenging traditional mechanisms for monitoring and controlling sensitive technology transfers. Additional risks include cyber and data integrity threats, such as the subtle manipulation of build files – which can introduce latent part failures that evade conventional quality checks, as well as a growing number of non-traditional defence contractors unfamiliar with dual-use compliance obligations.

Looking ahead, participants at the event identified the convergence of additive manufaturing with artificial intelligence (AI) as a significant trend. AI is lowering skill barriers across all three verticals of the technology (materials, machines and software), expanding access while compounding traceability challenges. The speakers also emphasized the importance of addressing these risks while the technology remains in a relatively early stage of development, before governance challenges become more difficult to manage.

Current governance approaches

Export controls have been the primary governance response to additive manufacturing. While export control lists differ in terms of what they encompass, they broadly include goods, software and technical assistance. However, their application to intangible transfers remains inconsistent and difficult to enforce.

A common problem is the lack of shared interpretation on how controls apply to digital file transfers.

Enforcement capacity also lags: building prosecutable evidence for digital transfer cases, developing digital forensic capabilities, and developing specialized legal expertise remain challenges in most jurisdictions. Speakers at UNIDIR’s dialogue noted that foreign direct investment screening offers a useful complementary instrument, particularly given rapid company formation, failure and acquisiton in fast-growing sectors that adopt additive manufacturing technologies.

Towards proportionate governance

The event highlighted the need for clearer regulation and practical guidance, developed in consultation with industry rather than imposed through broad legal language in multilateral frameworks. Participants identified use-case differentiation as a more effective approach, rather than treating additive manufacturing as a single risk category.

Oversight should also be applied proportionally, according to the criticality and consequence of what is being produced. Standards, qualification pathways, and digital thread integrity frameworks can embed compliance expectations across the 3D printing ecosystem in a scalable way – making legitimate production verifiable through auditable build records without restricting general-purpose use.

Speakers also stressed that internationally recognized standards can help reduce regulatory fragmentation by providing common technical approaches across jurisdictions, even where national regulatory frameworks differ.

Across all recommendations, a recurring message was the need for continuous, technically informed multistakeholder dialogue as the technology evolves.

UNIDIR’s Science and Technology Watchtower project aims to contribute to this awareness-raising effort, and this dialogue marked a step towards bringing additive manufacturing governance onto the arms control community’s agenda. Previous events under the project’s umbrella have explored issues surrounding quantum technologies, uncrewed systems, cybersecurity, AI and the Biological Weapons Convention, and more.

The post UNIDIR highlights arms control challenges posed by additive manufacturing first appeared on UNIDIR.

All engineering systems are developed across a lifecycle which generally consists of stages which include planning, development, implementation, operation and maintenance, and decommissioning.

The latter is an integral part of the systems engineering lifecycle process. The current opacity around decommissioning practices for AI systems, particularly military AI systems, leaves a gap in the understanding of their complete lifecycle. All systems ultimately have an end-of-life; that is, a point at which they are no longer fit for purpose and continuing to operate a system beyond this point presents both safety and legal risks.

This project will specifically focus on the decommissioning phase of AI-enabled military systems.

Unpacking decommissioning

What distinguishes decommissioning considerations of AI-enabled systems from that of conventional engineering counterparts is their software-driven nature. While many are cyber-physical systems (having both software and hardware components), it is the software component which introduces unique points of consideration.

Software is intangible and not subject to physical degradation or erosion over time. Its malleability and amorphousness also mean it changes with time. These factors impact when, why and how these systems are decommissioned.

The increasingly intertwined relationship between civil and military technology sectors, evident through data sharing and capacity building, adds an additional layer of complexity to decommissioning. The overlapping uses and applications of AI-enabled technologies and their infrastructure across these two domains also impacts when, why and how these systems are decommissioned.

The journey ahead

UNIDIR’s project will investigate the end-of-life of AI systems, presenting a framework to determine when a software-enabled system is no longer fit for purpose. It will also explore how these systems can be subsequently decommissioned.

Over the next two years, this research initiative will focus on:

1. Determining what constitutes the end-of-life of software.
2. Exploring different forms of decommissioning.
3. Understanding repurposing as a form of decommissioning.

In addition, the decommissioning of AI-systems project will convene multidisciplinary expert workshops across different regions to inform and advance this research.

Led by UNIDIR Fellow Associate Professor Zena Assad, the research is conducted in collaboration with UNIDIR’s Security and Technology Programme. To learn more about the project or to get involved, please contact zena.assaad@anu.edu.au.

The post Decommissioning military AI systems first appeared on UNIDIR.

Arms control and disarmament measures are often absent from multilateral discussions concerning the WPS Agenda. Yet at the national level, States are increasingly connecting these policy areas through their National Action Plans (NAPs) on WPS.

UNIDIR’s recently released Closing Gaps report analyzed 197 NAPs on WPS, revealing that over 70% include at least one mention to arms control and disarmament issues. However, most of these references appear only in introductory sections, rather than under proposed actions. To support States with moving from recognition to implementation, UNIDIR gathered concrete examples of actions and indicators that can advance the WPS Agenda and prepared a practical toolkit for addressing weapons-related risks in NAPs. These resources formed a key foundation for discussions throughout the workshop.

A diverse group of engaged actors

The event brought together more than 30 experts from a dozen European countries – including Albania, Austria, Georgia, Kosovo, Moldova, North Macedonia, Romania, Serbia, Slovenia and Ukraine. Participants represented a wide range of stakeholders, including officials from ministries, gender equality agencies, military and academic institutions, national cybersecurity authorities, civil society and international organizations.

The workshop opened with high-level remarks from Slovenian officials Neva Grašič, State Secretary, and Darja Bavdaž Kuret, Ambassador-at-Large for Women, Peace and Security. Both highlighted the urgency of addressing evolving security risks — including weapons proliferation, hybrid warfare and emerging technologies — through a gender-responsive lens. They also stressed the importance of full, meaningful and equal participation of women in all areas of international security, which is one of the main pillars of the WPS Agenda.

Gendered dimensions of weapons, technology and security

The programme included thematic sessions outlining how gender-related considerations shape demand for, as well as impacts of, firearms in the region. Participants discussed options to strengthen arms control and disarmament measures that also seek to prevent the occurrence of sexual and gender‑based violence, in line with the WPS Agenda.

Given current developments concerning the use of landmines, the workshop also featured experts working with mine action in a number of contexts. They shared common challenges and good practices to foster inclusive participation in demining, risk education, victim assistance and international cooperation.

Participants also had an opportunity to discuss cybersecurity and military applications of artificial intelligence. They explored how these technologies intersect with the WPS Agenda and how national actors can integrate these topics into their work, including in WPS NAPs. This can help to ensure that the WPS framework remains relevant in the digital age, and efforts around addressing challenges and opportunities created by new technologies are not undertaken in silos.

Learning by doing

One of the highlights of the programme was a hands-on simulation, where participants split into two groups, taking on distinct roles in a drafting exercise focused on developing a WPS NAP that included specific arms control and disarmament measures. This exercise aimed at providing national actors with concrete ideas on how to integrate arms control and disarmament into their WPS design, drafting process and implementation, as well as monitoring and evaluation efforts.

The workshop concluded with renewed commitment from participants and new networks that will foster regional cooperation on arms control, disarmament and the WPS Agenda. UNIDIR and its partners will continue supporting States in advancing an inclusive approach to arms control and disarmament – one that ensures that gender equality and the WPS Agenda are not seen as add-on considerations, but rather central elements of international security.

The post UNIDIR delivers regional workshop in Slovenia to advance the Women, Peace and Security Agenda first appeared on UNIDIR.

The proliferation of illicit conventional arms and ammunition in West Africa continues to pose a significant threat to State and human security, undermining both stability and development across the region. Recognizing these challenges, Guinea undertook a nationally led WAM baseline assessment, utilizing UNIDIR’s reference methodology to systematically review institutional and operational capacities, processes and practices, in line with regional and international standards. The assessment also identified needs and national priority areas for improvement, and fostered ownership of the arms control agenda among national stakeholders.

A nationally led WAM baseline assessment

The opening ceremony, held under the auspices of ComNat-ALPC, featured remarks from senior government officials, including General David Haba, Chief of Cabinet of the Minister of Defense. Speaking on behalf of the Minister of Defense and high-level national authorities, he highlighted the vital importance of this initiative for the country’s security and stability. Joseph Ahoba, Director of the Small Arms Division at ECOWAS, formally opened the ceremony on behalf of the regional organization.

Building foundations for the future

Over the course of the week, participants engaged in high-level and technical discussions to establish a clear baseline of Guinea’s institutional and operational capacities across ten key functional areas of WAM. These include:

• National coordination mechanisms
• The legal and regulatory framework
• Transfer controls
• Stockpile management of weapons and ammunition
• Marking
• Recordkeeping
• Tracing and profiling
• Processing of illicit arms and ammunition
• Weapons collection
• Disposal of weapons and ammunition

The assessment provided a platform for stakeholders to share experiences, identify challenges and validate practical recommendations for strengthening the national WAM framework.

Driving an integrated and sustainable approach

The assessment process required active engagement to guide discussions and extract actionable findings. The workshop culminated in the substantive consolidation of key outputs including the drafting of a national roadmap. In exercising ownership of the assessment process, Guinean stakeholders led the validation of this roadmap during the final plenary session, facilitated by UNIDIR experts. In closing, national stakeholders confirmed that Guinea will utilize the validated options and recommendations to strengthen the national WAM framework. They emphasized the critical role of safe, secure and sustainable WAM for peace, security and development.

The path forward

As a next step, UNIDIR’s Conventional Arms and Ammunition Programme remains closely engaged with ECOWAS and the ComNat-ALPC. UNIDIR hopes to draw upon the assessment findings to produce a publicly available WAM Country Insight publication, intended to inform targeted international assistance as well as future policy development.

Crucially, this national WAM baseline assessment undertaken by Guinea also strengthened ECOWAS’ regional ownership and leadership in utilizing UNIDIR’s reference methodology in support of its Member States. Concurrently, it directly contributed to the strengthening of Guinea’s national framework through actionable, guided, expert recommendations.

UNIDIR remains committed to supporting Member States in building resilient and effective national and regional frameworks for weapons and ammunition management. Recent similar work in Senegal demonstrates UNIDIR’s ongoing efforts to raise awareness and monitor WAM progress made across West Africa. The Institute’s reference methodology will also soon be made available in Portuguese, unlocking new avenues for support and cooperation across the region.

The post Strengthening Guinea’s framework for weapons and ammunition management first appeared on UNIDIR.

Through a series of dedicated sessions, UNIDIR shepherded discussions reflecting its ongoing work on AI and international peace and security. The Institute led on exchanges to advance the operationalization of responsible AI principles – a priority identified in the summit’s outcome document.

A longstanding commitment to responsible AI

UNIDIR’s participation at REAIM 2026 builds on sustained contributions to the initiative. The Institute has played an advisory role to successive host States (the Netherlands, the Republic of Korea, and Spain) – well before 2023, helping inform REAIM’s evolution.

This leadership has extended beyond intergovernmental settings, through the design and delivery of the 2025 REAIM Regional Consultations. It also facilitated structured multi-stakeholder engagement, as well as expert contributions to the Global Commission on Responsible AI in the Military Domain.

Rooted in independence, technical depth, and constant engagement, UNIDIR continues to translate evidence into policy-relevant pathways and solutions – particularly as States face governance challenges around the military implications of AI.

Regional dialogue and partnerships at the forefront

In the margins of REAIM 2026, UNIDIR Director Robin Geiss met with Kenya’s Cabinet Secretary for Defense, Hon. Soipan Tuya, reaffirming and deepening cooperation between the Institute and Kenya on responsible AI in the military domain. The exchange reflected a shared commitment to advancing responsible approaches to military AI and underscored the importance of trust-based, inclusive partnerships at both regional and global levels.

Kenya’s leadership was also evident as the host of the 2024 and 2025 REAIM Regional Consultations for Africa, which highlighted the value of inclusive regional dialogue and locally grounded perspectives in shaping global governance debates on emerging technologies and international security.

In this vein, UNIDIR launched its summary report capturing the perspectives shared at the 2025 REAIM Regional Consultations. The Global Prism of Military AI Governance presents existing national policies and best practices for the governance of AI in the military domain, as well as views from discussions held with multi-stakeholder communities across regions.

The report looks into the operationalization of responsible AI principles across the life cycle of AI-enabled military capabilities through lenses of procurement, incident response, crisis management and risk reduction. It offers quantitative data on assurance prioritization for the purchase of different military AI capabilities. The publication also lays out States’ reflections on the REAIM journey – three years from the inaugural summit. It concludes by identifying substantive priority areas that States wish to see further pursued, both within REAIM and beyond, before presenting a series of concrete recommendations for the road ahead.

UNIDIR’s Security and Technology Programme also met with representatives from the Center for International Security and Strategy (CISS) of Tsinghua University. The discussions highlighted the value of partnerships with leading academic institutions and built on ongoing collaboration through UNIDIR’s Roundtable for AI, Security and Ethics (RAISE). The meeting also constituted an opportunity to exchange on good practices of confidence-building measures on AI in the military domain, emphasizing the work of CISS Tsinghua University’s US-China Track-2 Dialogue on AI and International Security with the Brookings Institution, and offered pathways for further cooperation with UNIDIR.

Engaging industry on military AI

Industry engagement was another central focus for UNIDIR at REAIM 2026, reflecting the increasingly decisive role of private sector actors in shaping AI-enabled military capabilities. From system design and data practices to testing, deployment and post-deployment support, industry decisions have a direct impact on reliability, predictability, accountability and the risk of harm in real-world contexts. As governance efforts in the military AI domain advance, effective collaboration with industry has become critical to translating shared principles into practice.

At the summit, UNIDIR – in partnership with the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) – launched the Framework of Responsible Industry Behaviour for AI in the Military Domain. This sets out a practical and actionable set of voluntary guidelines aimed at providing a common baseline for responsible industry conduct. The framework offers governments and other stakeholders greater clarity on responsible AI procurement and public-private partnerships.

Ahead of the launch, UNIDIR and the OHCHR convened a closed-door roundtable with industry representatives attending the summit. They were joined by framework collaborators from Microsoft, the Japan Defense Technology Foundation and Hitachi America, Ltd. The exchanges, held under the Chatham House rule, provided space for the private sector to share perspectives on substantive and project-oriented themes. They explored risk perceptions and practical strategies to address them, misuse pathways and assurance gaps, priority areas for governance, and the value of the framework at this point in time.

What’s next for military AI governance

During his remarks at the high-level plenary session, UNIDIR Director echoed what many participants at the summit have noted: REAIM is at an inflection point. The summit has been instrumental in catalyzing global momentum on responsible military AI. The 2024 and 2025 REAIM Regional Consultations, in particular, have translated international debate into regional and national relevance.

Yet, as UN processes are now growing, future efforts for the governance of AI in the military domain must be approached with coherence in mind. Coherence will be key for the effectiveness and optimization of available resources, and to ensure that ultimately, the development and deployment of AI will foster international peace and security – not undermine it.

With proper governance in place, military AI could help reduce harm to civilians by improving situational awareness, highlighting uncertainty, and supporting more careful use of force.

Robin Geiss, UNIDIR Director

UNIDIR’s participation at REAIM 2026 marks the beginning of much work to build on the discussions held in A Coruña, with a host of opportunities for States, the private sector and the wider multi-stakeholder community to contribute meaningfully to the Institute’s work.

UNIDIR is actively on the lookout for collaborators to support the development of the Framework of Responsible Industry Behaviour for AI in the Military Domain. Collaboration does not imply endorsement or entail binding commitments, but industry participation in the development process will be critical to the framework’s ultimate utility and effectiveness.

Looking ahead, UNIDIR will organize the second edition of its Global Conference on AI, Security and Ethics on 18-19 June 2026. This will be held consecutively to the informal exchange in Geneva on AI in the military domain and its implications for international peace and security, organized pursuant to the UN First Committee Resolution 80/58. UNIDIR welcomes the submission of proposals to hold thematic deep-dives, lightning talks and poster presentations, the details of which will be released in late February.

The post UNIDIR highlights regional and industry engagement at REAIM 2026 first appeared on UNIDIR.